I was stupid enough to purchase the VM off someone who was having constant issues. Used it as a TOR relay. Got suspended for using bandwidth.
Come back, now it's 'The process of rebuilding a VM is in progress. Please wait.'
This guy will be incredibly helpful until you try to login and find your system has been disappeared, suspended, or 'rebuilding'
Just tried starting two systems I had on POM2 that become unavailable every day or two due to power outages, and they timed out trying to mount the disk.
He's reached a new level of overselling, OS won't boot.
I don't see any bottom left to scrape in this barrel, the closest competitors to 900 GB storage for 10 €/y are 2 times more expensive and 100 times more reliable, this offer doesn't compete against competitors but against the impossible itself.
"Challenge accepted!", I guess.
It'd be interesting if you plotted an elasticity curve and shared it online; if you price these offers at 15€ they would still be the cheapest of their class, but would give you more margin to reduce overselling and deal with the hardware issues, which seem the reasons why you're not getting customers in the first place.
As soon as the RAM space is needed by any other application, the cache is cleared and space made available to the new application immediately
If the QEMU guest agent is disabled, the hypervisor has no way of knowing the actual RAM usage of the guest and will (for safety) block it’s RAM allocation so other can’t use it
@c1vhosting i recommend you sell LXC containers instead of KVM machines, especially for this price, LXC is way superior and can lower the overall resource usage significantly.
Combine this information with performance advisoryand strictly no refund policy once service has been delivered -- all I can say, make an informed decision
@Ahui said:
POM3，The VPS on GB5 only has 200 points, and you are still oversold
From what I see it is because you are abusing the resources you have, so a CPU usage limit has been applied to you to protect other users.
Consider that I see that for over two months your server has been constantly consuming 7.5GB of RAM out of 8 and at least 50% of the cpu, with peaks at 100%. You have never gone below these values ... I would not be surprised if the resources have been limited in fact.
You are lucky that we are not suspending your service due to the continuous high CPU and RAM usage like many providers would do.
It depends on your VPS, not on the node itself. If you can share me your service id in DM I'll take a look.
I sent it to you privately
I have also noticed you are on pom4 not on pom3.
You should have read it wrong. I only use 2.5G of memory and have 5.5G of free memory. If you need it, you can recycle 4GB of memory and keep only 4GB enough for use
You should check your VPS, maybe you have a virus or something if you don't recognize this much usage.
It's a problem with your panel display. You should go to Proxmox to check
His panel shows incorrect and much higher memory usage when Windows OS is running on the VPS.
has 4/24 4 * 256=1024 IP addresses, while you currently only have 4 nodes, which means that each node has at least 230-250 VPS. However, you are using an outdated Intel E5v4 CPU, which is the fatal cause of CPU theft
Based on your past activities, the CPU allocated to each VPS is 2 cores, with 2 * 230=460. This means that the CPU allocated to each VPS node is 460 cores, while your E5-2697Av4 dual CPU only has 32 * 2=64 cores. It can be imagined that your CPU theft was caused by overselling, with a 64 core CPU selling 460 cores
@Ahui said:
Based on your past activities, the CPU allocated to each VPS is 2 cores, with 2 * 230=460. This means that the CPU allocated to each VPS node is 460 cores, while your E5-2697Av4 dual CPU only has 32 * 2=64 cores. It can be imagined that your CPU theft was caused by overselling, with a 64 core CPU selling 460 cores
it is already covered under performance advisory that translates to extremely low expectations.
There is still room for 480 more VPS on each node. Do not worry, strictly no refund policy will take care of it.
After all, this is AI enabled VPS powered by the data center housed in a basement right next to garage
The number of VPS for each node should be controlled within 100
That's ridonkulous. Accordingly, here is only one piece of advice for you:
Quadruple your budget for your 'suggestions'.
If C1V really did as you suggested, the price of the VPS would be unacceptable.
I can't even find your similar products during Black Friday, nice wish though.
The number of VPS for each node should be controlled within 100
That's ridonkulous. Accordingly, here is only one piece of advice for you:
Quadruple your budget for your 'suggestions'.
If C1V really did as you suggested, the price of the VPS would be unacceptable.
I can't even find your similar products during Black Friday, nice wish though.
Then how come $1 vps from companies like NetCup continue to work fine?
@dev_vps said: Then how come $1 vps from companies like NetCup continue to work fine?
Did you just compared NetCup to c1vhosting? :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
well I am paying euro 0.84 / month .... cost is similar .... performance is better since NetCup datacenter is not housed in same professional manner as @c1vhosting
and @c1vhosting does not offer monthly plan for "performance advisory" VPS, because business model and strict no refund policy work better on annual plan.
@c1vhosting "performance advisory" VPS won't even offer quarterly plan ... say 4 euros/quarter in stead of 10 euros/year ... even though on paper that model brings more money.
@dev_vps said: Then how come $1 vps from companies like NetCup continue to work fine?
Thanks for mentioning. I was considering buying one VPS from NetCup, but I've many VPS idling so give up that thought.
The €1 VPS of NetCup you said is undoubtedly more stable than C1V's, and more powerful in terms of CPU. Different people in different situations can make their own suitable choices.
Here is a simple comparison between them:
Provider
CPU
Memory
Disk
Network
Price
Uptime
NetCup
QEMU, GB5 480
1 GB
30 GB SSD
Unlimited @ 1 Gbps limited @ 100 Mbps
12 EUR with VAT included or 10 EUR with VAT exempt
99% or more
C1V
E5-2698 v4, GB5 200
2000 MB
140 GB SSD
10 TB @ 1 Gbps
10 EUR
about 95%
As long as C1V doesn't deadpool, I may well choose it when P2P sharing.
@Mumbly said: Oh, there is/was one comparable. Look at this rainbow. It's like the old Berlin's Love Parade
Yeah, it is colorful. May I know the name of the provider so that I may buy one when offer comes during big sales. Thank you.
@bliss said: Yeah, it is colorful. May I know the name of the provider so that I may buy one when offer comes during big sales. Thank you.
The name is written above the rainbow, but I'm not sure if they'll still sell their stuff internationally. Their offer posting rights were revoked on the other forum, and they were never really a thing there.
@Mumbly said: The name is written above the rainbow,
Oh, my bad, I thought the name should be something more familiar. I guess the 'TR' means it is from Turkey, if that is the case, then I'll pass it because my past experience with ayyildizmedya.com (which is or fake itself as a Turkish company) was extremely awful.
@dev_vps said: Then how come $1 vps from companies like NetCup continue to work fine?
Thanks for mentioning. I was considering buying one VPS from NetCup, but I've many VPS idling so give up that thought.
The €1 VPS of NetCup you said is undoubtedly more stable than C1V's, and more powerful in terms of CPU. Different people in different situations can make their own suitable choices.
Here is a simple comparison between them:
Provider
CPU
Memory
Disk
Network
Price
Uptime
NetCup
QEMU, GB5 480
1 GB
30 GB SSD
Unlimited @ 1 Gbps limited @ 100 Mbps
12 EUR with VAT included or 10 EUR with VAT exempt
99% or more
C1V
E5-2698 v4, GB5 200
2000 MB
140 GB SSD
10 TB @ 1 Gbps
10 EUR
about 95%
As long as C1V doesn't deadpool, I may well choose it when P2P sharing.
@Mumbly said: Oh, there is/was one comparable. Look at this rainbow. It's like the old Berlin's Love Parade
Yeah, it is colorful. May I know the name of the provider so that I may buy one when offer comes during big sales. Thank you.
Well, GB6 score is looking pretty good for @c1vhosting
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 3 hours, 47 minutes
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores : 2 @ 2199.996 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 7.6 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 78.7 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-13-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
ASN : AS212271 Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
Host : C1V Hosting
Location : Milan, Lombardy (25)
Country : Italy
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 80.08 MB/s (20.0k) | 1.35 GB/s (21.1k)
Write | 80.29 MB/s (20.0k) | 1.36 GB/s (21.2k)
Total | 160.38 MB/s (40.0k) | 2.71 GB/s (42.4k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.28 GB/s (2.5k) | 1.08 GB/s (1.0k)
Write | 1.34 GB/s (2.6k) | 1.15 GB/s (1.1k)
Total | 2.63 GB/s (5.1k) | 2.23 GB/s (2.1k)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 538 Mbits/sec | 969 Mbits/sec | 33.4 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 845 Mbits/sec | 988 Mbits/sec | 35.1 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 373 Mbits/sec | 717 Mbits/sec | 90.1 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 263 Mbits/sec | 750 Mbits/sec | 276 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 367 Mbits/sec | 725 Mbits/sec | 162 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 534 Mbits/sec | 756 Mbits/sec | 104 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 231 Mbits/sec | 830 Mbits/sec | 222 ms
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 734 Mbits/sec | 974 Mbits/sec | 33.5 ms
Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 695 Mbits/sec | 975 Mbits/sec | 35.1 ms
Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 200 Mbits/sec | 935 Mbits/sec | 82.8 ms
Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 239 Mbits/sec | 658 Mbits/sec | 275 ms
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 327 Mbits/sec | 713 Mbits/sec | 173 ms
Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 419 Mbits/sec | 804 Mbits/sec | 108 ms
Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 194 Mbits/sec | 778 Mbits/sec | 221 ms
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 519
Multi Core | 943
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22804162
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 643
Multi Core | 1112
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7462091
@bliss said: Oh, my bad, I thought the name should be something more familiar. I guess the 'TR' means it is from Turkey, if that is the case, then I'll pass it because my past experience with ayyildizmedya.com (which is or fake itself as a Turkish company) was extremely awful.
There was a huge pretty funny drama involving this and other Turkish hosts. AWM appeared legitimate (if we can say that...) while the other host appeared as quick money grab scam operation running by the same people. Both were selling heavily oversold 8GB plans for like $11/y or so.
I ended up stuck with this VPS for a year doing nothing
Despite all the network outages, the uptime is actually slightly better than it was with C1V when I was hosted with them.
Yes, my point is the specs of C1V's VPS may not be shining but the specs is worth the price. While nobody can deny that the service is not stable (uptime is about 95%).
I just can't understand why some people constantly complain the CPU or memory, yes, I know the CPU is feeble (eg. compiling aMule-cli takes more than 10 minutes compared with less than 30 seconds on my desktop or 3 minutes on other $10-ish VPS) and the memory is 2000MB = 2GB, but anyway it is worth the price as of now.
Yes, my point is the specs of C1V's VPS may not be shining but the specs is worth the price. While nobody can deny that the service is not stable (uptime is about 95%).
I just can't understand why some people constantly complain the CPU or memory, yes, I know the CPU is feeble (eg. compiling aMule-cli takes more than 10 minutes compared with less than 30 seconds on my desktop or 3 minutes on other $10-ish VPS) and the memory is 2000MB = 2GB, but anyway it is worth the price as of now.
Let's hope C1V continue for another year.
Because one day GB6 score would be 640 ... next day it could be 240, 400 , or even 180.
the performance fluctuates like a random wave pattern
and that is why it is good for hobby projects with zero performance expectancy
@Amadex said:
and still waiting, no success with connection
While waiting... clear your mind; put away all the bad thoughts of refund ticket, PayPal dispute and chargeback. Think of good things like exercising patience through waiting. Try to resist the chargeback urge.
Comments
Avoid this.
I was stupid enough to purchase the VM off someone who was having constant issues. Used it as a TOR relay. Got suspended for using bandwidth.
Come back, now it's 'The process of rebuilding a VM is in progress. Please wait.'
This guy will be incredibly helpful until you try to login and find your system has been disappeared, suspended, or 'rebuilding'
Just tried starting two systems I had on POM2 that become unavailable every day or two due to power outages, and they timed out trying to mount the disk.
He's reached a new level of overselling, OS won't boot.
EDIT: Message: Can't lock file '/var/lock/qemu-server/lock-1664.conf' - got timeout
This should say enough. The hypervisor can't even take reboot commands. Never send money to this thief.
I moved all my websites to Carrd, and cancelled all my idlers.
Save the earth, don't idle.
High cpu steals even during idle state
avoid
I have never seen providers suspend customer service due to high memory usage.
Isn't the memory of KVM guests dedicated?
VirMach: Customer’s Service cannot use more than 10% of the monthly allocated bandwidth in under twenty-four (24) hours.
https://virmach.com/terms-conditions/#aup
...and despite everything he still has the provider tag
"How miserable life is in the abuses of power..."
F. Battiato ---
Maybe the time has come for the inevitable.
Have you tried turning it off and on again?dedicated RAMItalians style - just like Germans will sell youdedicated CPUHaven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.
I don't see any bottom left to scrape in this barrel, the closest competitors to 900 GB storage for 10 €/y are 2 times more expensive and 100 times more reliable, this offer doesn't compete against competitors but against the impossible itself.
"Challenge accepted!", I guess.
It'd be interesting if you plotted an elasticity curve and shared it online; if you price these offers at 15€ they would still be the cheapest of their class, but would give you more margin to reduce overselling and deal with the hardware issues, which seem the reasons why you're not getting customers in the first place.
AD: VPS Price Tracker
Silght correction
HDD? So you're telling me this thing can go even slower? Noice
LinuxFreek.com — Thank you for your attention to this matter
@c1vhosting i recommend you sell LXC containers instead of KVM machines, especially for this price, LXC is way superior and can lower the overall resource usage significantly.
Combine this information with performance advisoryand strictly no refund policy once service has been delivered -- all I can say, make an informed decision
There are much better offers for similar budget
Effectively one is expected to use 1 GB or less ... for the VPS advertised with 2gb and "high CPU steal".
No wonder there is strictly no refund policy
His panel shows incorrect and much higher memory usage when Windows OS is running on the VPS.
Do you want screenshots for this, @c1vhosting ?
Here are a few suggestions for you
Add more nodes
Replace AMD EPYC CPU
Low cost VPS prohibits installation of Windows
The number of VPS for each node should be controlled within 100
I noticed that your ASN:AS212271
has 4/24 4 * 256=1024 IP addresses, while you currently only have 4 nodes, which means that each node has at least 230-250 VPS. However, you are using an outdated Intel E5v4 CPU, which is the fatal cause of CPU theft
Based on your past activities, the CPU allocated to each VPS is 2 cores, with 2 * 230=460. This means that the CPU allocated to each VPS node is 460 cores, while your E5-2697Av4 dual CPU only has 32 * 2=64 cores. It can be imagined that your CPU theft was caused by overselling, with a 64 core CPU selling 460 cores
I've been on C1V's HDD... Ask me anything
AD: VPS Price Tracker
it is already covered under performance advisory that translates to extremely low expectations.
There is still room for 480 more VPS on each node. Do not worry, strictly no refund policy will take care of it.
After all, this is AI enabled VPS powered by the data center housed in a basement right next to garage
That's ridonkulous. Accordingly, here is only one piece of advice for you:
Quadruple your budget for your 'suggestions'.
If C1V really did as you suggested, the price of the VPS would be unacceptable.
I can't even find your similar products during Black Friday, nice wish though.
MicroLXC is lovable.
Must be going blind, all ears, pencil in hand...
Then how come $1 vps from companies like NetCup continue to work fine?
Did you just compared NetCup to c1vhosting? :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.
well I am paying euro 0.84 / month .... cost is similar .... performance is better since NetCup datacenter is not housed in same professional manner as @c1vhosting
and @c1vhosting does not offer monthly plan for "performance advisory" VPS, because business model and strict no refund policy work better on annual plan.
@c1vhosting "performance advisory" VPS won't even offer quarterly plan ... say 4 euros/quarter in stead of 10 euros/year ... even though on paper that model brings more money.
This $10/year VPS performance is way better, not with @c1vhosting
Oh, there is/was one comparable. Look at this rainbow. It's like the old Berlin's Love Parade
Thanks for mentioning. I was considering buying one VPS from NetCup, but I've many VPS idling so give up that thought.
The €1 VPS of NetCup you said is undoubtedly more stable than C1V's, and more powerful in terms of CPU. Different people in different situations can make their own suitable choices.
Here is a simple comparison between them:
As long as C1V doesn't deadpool, I may well choose it when P2P sharing.
Yeah, it is colorful. May I know the name of the provider so that I may buy one when offer comes during big sales. Thank you.
MicroLXC is lovable.
The name is written above the rainbow, but I'm not sure if they'll still sell their stuff internationally. Their offer posting rights were revoked on the other forum, and they were never really a thing there.
Oh, my bad, I thought the name should be something more familiar. I guess the 'TR' means it is from Turkey, if that is the case, then I'll pass it because my past experience with ayyildizmedya.com (which is or fake itself as a Turkish company) was extremely awful.
I still love Turkey though.
MicroLXC is lovable.
Well, GB6 score is looking pretty good for @c1vhosting
There was a huge pretty funny drama involving this and other Turkish hosts. AWM appeared legitimate (if we can say that...) while the other host appeared as quick money grab scam operation running by the same people. Both were selling heavily oversold 8GB plans for like $11/y or so.
I ended up stuck with this VPS for a year doing nothing
Despite all the network outages, the uptime is actually slightly better than it was with C1V when I was hosted with them.
Debian 11 installed directly from source
Yes, my point is the specs of C1V's VPS may not be shining but the specs is worth the price. While nobody can deny that the service is not stable (uptime is about 95%).
I just can't understand why some people constantly complain the CPU or memory, yes, I know the CPU is feeble (eg. compiling aMule-cli takes more than 10 minutes compared with less than 30 seconds on my desktop or 3 minutes on other $10-ish VPS) and the memory is 2000MB = 2GB, but anyway it is worth the price as of now.
Let's hope C1V continue for another year.
MicroLXC is lovable.
Wanted to test the storage server, but can't connect to ssh.
@c1vhosting
Amadex • Hosting Forums • root.hr
Maybe you need to wait... and wait... and wait... until there is some time for OpenSSH's turn within all that CPU steal.
Cloudcone | Crunchbits | Dartnode | Dedirock | Georgedatacenter | Gigahost | Hostbilby | Host-c | Hostdzire | Hostsailor | Namecrane | Nuyek | Realtoxmedia | Servarica | Terabit | Tnahosting | Virmach
Because one day GB6 score would be 640 ... next day it could be 240, 400 , or even 180.
the performance fluctuates like a random wave pattern
and that is why it is good for hobby projects with zero performance expectancy
actually it is
and still waiting, no success with connection
Amadex • Hosting Forums • root.hr
While waiting... clear your mind; put away all the bad thoughts of refund ticket, PayPal dispute and chargeback. Think of good things like exercising patience through waiting. Try to resist the chargeback urge.
Cloudcone | Crunchbits | Dartnode | Dedirock | Georgedatacenter | Gigahost | Hostbilby | Host-c | Hostdzire | Hostsailor | Namecrane | Nuyek | Realtoxmedia | Servarica | Terabit | Tnahosting | Virmach
Imagine it was 1945, we would have dedicated RAM and dedicated CPU now
Amadex • Hosting Forums • root.hr
Amadex • Hosting Forums • root.hr
Translation -
This server is designed for basic tasks and is suitable only for extremely low-performance applications.
I hope Ms. Cinzia Tocci will answer us.
Amadex • Hosting Forums • root.hr
Cloudcone | Crunchbits | Dartnode | Dedirock | Georgedatacenter | Gigahost | Hostbilby | Host-c | Hostdzire | Hostsailor | Namecrane | Nuyek | Realtoxmedia | Servarica | Terabit | Tnahosting | Virmach
good luck waiting 😌
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
[url=https://ibb.co/ncN55MQ][img]https://i.ibb.co/ncN55MQ/Screenshot-20240824-040405-One-UI-Home.jpg[/img][/url]
Amadex • Hosting Forums • root.hr
Using SSH is abusing the network connection!
But one can use just "ping", to be sure the service idles successfully.
Cloudcone | Crunchbits | Dartnode | Dedirock | Georgedatacenter | Gigahost | Hostbilby | Host-c | Hostdzire | Hostsailor | Namecrane | Nuyek | Realtoxmedia | Servarica | Terabit | Tnahosting | Virmach
but no more than 50% of time in last 48 years as this is illegal.
Haven't bought a single service in VirMach Great Ryzen 2022 - 2023 Flash Sale.
Cloudcone | Crunchbits | Dartnode | Dedirock | Georgedatacenter | Gigahost | Hostbilby | Host-c | Hostdzire | Hostsailor | Namecrane | Nuyek | Realtoxmedia | Servarica | Terabit | Tnahosting | Virmach