@poisson said:
Actually a lucky draw when we hit the milestones will also be fun! Reminds me of that event FAT32 did. I won an idling machine
He probably still has the entire setup ready to roll.
I have a suggestion on whether lucky draw should include the users joined earlier to increase their chance.
For example, when reaching 300 users, draw from 1-300 instead of 201-300. That means the earlier you join, the higher the chance of winning. Need approval from @cociu and @AnthonySmith
Round 0: Draw from 1-100 (Additional for early adopters)
Round 1: Draw from 1-300
Round 2: Draw from 1-400
Round 3: Draw from 1-500
Round 4: Draw from 1-600
Round 5: Draw from 1-700
Round 6: Draw from 1-800
Round 7: Draw from 1-900
Round 8: Draw from 1-1000
If it sounds good I can build a simple script and give the hashes of the seeds for the random algorithm.
Well, @FAT32 always comes up with the best ideas! What say you @AnthonySmith and @cociu? This is definitely a much more fun way to keep the entire community engaged, although server load might spike when everyone is camping for the results release.
Amazing idea!
At least I got the chance.
UpCloud free $25 through this aff link - Akamai, DigitalOcean and Vultr alternative, multiple location, IPv6.
How about it @cociu?
( Next prize as random draw at 300 members)This will encourage those that are not signing up NOW just to be the 300th member (aka account sniping)
FAT32 said: Round 0: Draw from 1-100 (Additional for early adopters)
Round 1: Draw from 1-300
Round 2: Draw from 1-400
Round 3: Draw from 1-500
Round 4: Draw from 1-600
Round 5: Draw from 1-700
Round 6: Draw from 1-800
Round 7: Draw from 1-900
Round 8: Draw from 1-1000
this is a nice ideea @AnthonySmith you can impement it if you want.
@poisson said:
Actually a lucky draw when we hit the milestones will also be fun! Reminds me of that event FAT32 did. I won an idling machine
He probably still has the entire setup ready to roll.
I have a suggestion on whether lucky draw should include the users joined earlier to increase their chance.
For example, when reaching 300 users, draw from 1-300 instead of 201-300. That means the earlier you join, the higher the chance of winning. Need approval from @cociu and @AnthonySmith
Round 0: Draw from 1-100 (Additional for early adopters)
Round 1: Draw from 1-300
Round 2: Draw from 1-400
Round 3: Draw from 1-500
Round 4: Draw from 1-600
Round 5: Draw from 1-700
Round 6: Draw from 1-800
Round 7: Draw from 1-900
Round 8: Draw from 1-1000
If it sounds good I can build a simple script and give the hashes of the seeds for the random algorithm.
"The imitator dooms himself to hopeless mediocrity." — Ralph Waldo Emerson
According to comment made by @AnthonySmith on November 19th 12:23 PM the following screenshot was provided with vanilla stats from the day before (screenshot was posted on Imgur one minute before the post). You can see in image that 199 users were registered at that moment of screenshot (on 18th of November 2019).
On November 19th at 01:05 PM (after this image was posted), user @nynynyny registered.
On November 19th at 01:15 PM (10 minutes later) user @FAT32 registered.
Somehow, @FAT32 was declared the winner as the number 200 account. I did not manage to analyze what other users registered after screenshot was announced or after the screenshot was taken (the day before). All I know, is that something does not feel right.
FreeBSD said: Somehow, @FAT32 was declared the winner as the number 200 account. I did not manage to analyze what other users registered after screenshot was announced or after the screenshot was taken. All I know, is that something does not feel right.
Test accounts and unconfirmed accounts are included in the statistics but not in the draw. That's why.
FreeBSD said: Somehow, @FAT32 was declared the winner as the number 200 account. I did not manage to analyze what other users registered after screenshot was announced or after the screenshot was taken. All I know, is that something does not feel right.
Test accounts and unconfirmed accounts are included in the statistics but not in the draw. That's why.
Indeed. This is also the reason why the number 100 winner wasn't literally the number 100 based on vanilla's number stamp. This was already declared upfront many days earlier. This is also the reason why if you trace the thread, I have asked Ant for updates from time to time so that we know what is the true picture.
Going forward, there will longer be such confusion.
@FreeBSD (guy?) asked and answered, a few times, if you spent half as much time reading the actual thread as you did looking for shit in a clean toilet you would have saved some time.
Not sure if I should do this but these are the SHA256 hash of the random generator seed for fairness purpose, the actual seed will be announced when we hit the target.
@tgl said:
FAT32 i think you got used to winning, i see you are trying to provide this backdoored code so you will win again
I am just trying to help, I can choose not to do so too. There might be complex mathematics and proofs to show that the algorithm is not equally distributed, but I don't think it is necessary to do so. I am quite skeptical about stuff so I always try to ensure fairness.
In addition, how can this be backdoored with few lines of codes? There's no known SHA256 collision yet, the seed is pre-determined even without knowing the upcoming users. In addition, the algorithm above depends on the latest registered user, how can I be sure who will be the X-th user?
If you insist on me winning something, feel free to take my VPS and enjoy your day.
Edit: I am not trying to start a drama here, but someone else choose to do so. I can tell you it is so much easier to fake a random.org than my algorithm. Self-sign a SSL certificate, point the IP to your own, and boom you can fake the result.
食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.
Comments
I like that idea @FAT32 :-)
Get the best deal on your next VPS or Shared/Reseller hosting from RacknerdTracker.com - The original aff garden.
Amazing idea!
At least I got the chance.
UpCloud free $25 through this aff link - Akamai, DigitalOcean and Vultr alternative, multiple location, IPv6.
How about it @cociu?
( Next prize as random draw at 300 members)This will encourage those that are not signing up NOW just to be the 300th member (aka account sniping)
Sorry, I shouldn't have done that
食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.
Playing within the rules is legitimate. Besides, no amount of sniping guarantees anything if everyone is trying to snipe!
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
Hey, I wasn't even thinking about you when I typed that.
Without the right incentives, the gap in time between 200-300 , may be as wide as 5 and 200 (thanks to the lurker effect).
Round 1: Draw from 1-300
Round 2: Draw from 1-400
Round 3: Draw from 1-500
Round 4: Draw from 1-600
Round 5: Draw from 1-700
Round 6: Draw from 1-800
Round 7: Draw from 1-900
Round 8: Draw from 1-1000
this is a nice ideea @AnthonySmith you can impement it if you want.
You are a wizard @FAT32
HS4LIFE (+ (* 3 4) (* 5 6))
i wanna win something!
I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.
食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.
Congrats FAT32
"The imitator dooms himself to hopeless mediocrity." — Ralph Waldo Emerson
what if LEST-BOT wins
Or one of Anthony's legion of test accounts? It's all fixed, I tell ya, fixed! Or something.
I consider the contest faulty.
According to comment made by @AnthonySmith on November 19th 12:23 PM the following screenshot was provided with vanilla stats from the day before (screenshot was posted on Imgur one minute before the post). You can see in image that 199 users were registered at that moment of screenshot (on 18th of November 2019).
On November 19th at 01:05 PM (after this image was posted), user @nynynyny registered.
On November 19th at 01:15 PM (10 minutes later) user @FAT32 registered.
Somehow, @FAT32 was declared the winner as the number 200 account. I did not manage to analyze what other users registered after screenshot was announced or after the screenshot was taken (the day before). All I know, is that something does not feel right.
Test accounts and unconfirmed accounts are included in the statistics but not in the draw. That's why.
Indeed. This is also the reason why the number 100 winner wasn't literally the number 100 based on vanilla's number stamp. This was already declared upfront many days earlier. This is also the reason why if you trace the thread, I have asked Ant for updates from time to time so that we know what is the true picture.
Going forward, there will longer be such confusion.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
@FreeBSD (guy?) asked and answered, a few times, if you spent half as much time reading the actual thread as you did looking for shit in a clean toilet you would have saved some time.
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
@FreeBSD
Anthony posted "5 away now" at November 19th 12:55 PM.
The last user to sign up before that was hoarder, user ID 216 at 12:24 PM:
The first user to sign up after that was CRTelevision, user ID 217, at 1:56 PM:
The user ID of CRTelevision being 217, 217 + 4 => 221, which is the user ID of FAT32. That can be verified here.
if this is going to turn in to a source of drama to belittle efforts we can just put an end to it now I guess.
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
Oh, I like that one. Stealing!
@FreeBSD are you @jsg man?
Or @default ?
UpCloud free $25 through this aff link - Akamai, DigitalOcean and Vultr alternative, multiple location, IPv6.
So... none of my 15 other accounts got flagged? ;-)
Edit: sorry for being totally irrelevant, I didn't notice I was on the first page of a 5 page thread...
Let me grab my tools.

That's looks like the perfect tool for a professional dominatrix servicing IT professionals.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
CAT5 of 9 tails
Get the best deal on your next VPS or Shared/Reseller hosting from RacknerdTracker.com - The original aff garden.
will cociu put the Black Friday offer here?
Every Friday is a Black Friday for @cociu
#dicks
"It's a hard life- to be a stick insect." - Karl Pilkington
Works best, if those RJ45 Connectors are snipped before use.
And some sisters too.
so whats the update on this? lol.
Sorry
Been busy with
292 users.
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
@FAT32 are we having a lucky draw soon?
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
@poisson if FAT32 wins again, its rigged
I have been out some days ... do we have a winner ?
If cociu wins it is even more rigged.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
Not sure if I should do this but these are the SHA256 hash of the random generator seed for fairness purpose, the actual seed will be announced when we hit the target.
This is the code to select a random user:
When the function above is called,
usernamewill be populated with the user with ID at the upper bound of the range.For example, to select a winner for Round 3, the function call will be
selectWinner('some_seed', 'username_of_the_user_with_id_500', 500)食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.
@AnthonySmith
https://www.random.org/
and record yourself with todays newspaper in your hand while doing it
@FAT32 i think you got used to winning, i see you are trying to provide this backdoored code so you will win again
I have never won a draw in my whole life.
Action and Reaction in history
I am just trying to help, I can choose not to do so too. There might be complex mathematics and proofs to show that the algorithm is not equally distributed, but I don't think it is necessary to do so. I am quite skeptical about stuff so I always try to ensure fairness.
In addition, how can this be backdoored with few lines of codes? There's no known SHA256 collision yet, the seed is pre-determined even without knowing the upcoming users. In addition, the algorithm above depends on the latest registered user, how can I be sure who will be the X-th user?
If you insist on me winning something, feel free to take my VPS and enjoy your day.
Edit: I am not trying to start a drama here, but someone else choose to do so. I can tell you it is so much easier to fake a random.org than my algorithm. Self-sign a SSL certificate, point the IP to your own, and boom you can fake the result.
食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.
He was just doing the art of $hitposting
Really ?
@FAT32 it seems you do not speak sarcasm! I was joking man
Don't scare the shit out of the cute dino!
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
Maybe my shitpost detection is not working properly, I am more used to deank / eol's shitpost.
If needed, I would rather lose a few bucks per month than being falsely accused as a cheater.
食之无味 弃之可惜 - Too arduous to relish, too wasteful to discard.
@FAT32 No accusation from my side. Just asked out of curiosity and maybe a little jealousy, hoping it was idling on your hand.