Your favorite linux server distro

edited November 2019 in Reviews

Let the war discussion begin...

DM us for private tracker invite.

Your favorite Linux Server Distro
  1. Select your favorite64 votes
    1. Ubuntu
      14.06%
    2. Debian
      53.13%
    3. RHEL/CentOS
      20.31%
    4. RancherOS
        0.00%
    5. Oracle Linux
        0.00%
    6. CloudLinux
        1.56%
    7. ArchLinux
        0.00%
    8. Other/Not Listed
        7.81%
    9. Linux wha..? BSD FTW!
        3.13%
«1

Comments

  • I learned on Debian and never ran into a situation that made me switch to a different distro.

  • You don't need to list arch. Their users will tell you they use arch without you asking them.

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • Debian, tks.

    BF/CM - Buyer Beware. Conduct your own due diligence on the sustainability of the deals presented here as well as the provider's track record.

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    Centos thx

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • I've always wanted to try CentOS/RHEL, but their package system is too confusing for me. Every guide for installing software tells you to add some repositories, and each blog lists different ones! Coming from Debian I instinctively think it poses a security risk and is a maintenance hassle (what if some repository goes down?). Same applies to Ubuntu.

    Sadly all "difference between debian and centos" blog posts I find are SEO text.

  • Ubuntu, For being out-of-the-box.

  • Windows NT 4.0

    FTW!!!!!

  • Debian, thx.

  • efXefX OG
    edited November 2019

    Also Debian

  • Debian for most things, Ubuntu for a tiny number of things and CentOS only where WHM/cPanel is required.

    Get the best deal on your next VPS or Shared/Reseller hosting from RacknerdTracker.com - The original aff garden.

  • No surprise for the popularity of debian here. Stable and easy to use. Because I started my servers with Debian, I went for a Debian derivative for desktop.

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • General Debian

    For small specs servers I like centos.

  • I started out with CentOS, then switched to Debian and never looked back.

    Amitz, a very stable genius (it's true!) and Grand Rectumfier of the official LESLOS® (LES League of Shitposters).
    Certified braindead since 1974 and still perfectly happy.

  • TinyCoreLinux

  • Debian on the original XBox. Next favorite, Raspbian.

    Yes, I did read the question.

  • AbdullahAbdullah ProviderOG

    Debian min. Install always.

  • Has the Gentoo crowd moved to Arch?
    Never heard of RancherOS, guess I stopped paying attention to DistroWatch ... :p

  • aRNoLDaRNoLD OG
    edited November 2019

    I tried Debian, Ubuntu and CentOS. It could be great that Debian LTS last as long as CentOS, ten years.

    If I am to pick only one distro, then it is Debian, plus ver jessie/buster. It was CentOS if I was asked last year.

  • @poisson said:
    No surprise for the popularity of debian here. Stable and easy to use. Because I started my servers with Debian, I went for a Debian derivative for desktop.

    Curious, what's your desktop distro?

    DM us for private tracker invite.

  • @Janevski said:
    TinyCoreLinux

    That's something.

    DM us for private tracker invite.

  • poisson said: I went for a Debian derivative for desktop.

    terrorgen said: Curious, what's your desktop distro?

    Rahul said: Ubuntu, For being out-of-the-box.

    AmIRight ?

  • Ubuntu is not the only Debian based out of the box distro, bro...

    DM us for private tracker invite.

  • @terrorgen said:

    @poisson said:
    No surprise for the popularity of debian here. Stable and easy to use. Because I started my servers with Debian, I went for a Debian derivative for desktop.

    Curious, what's your desktop distro?

    Mint, which is based on Ubuntu, which is based on Debian. A second derivative of Debian (using a calculus analogy).

    I think Mint is the best out of the box solution that can rival Windows and Mac in terms of driver support and a great GUI. Some people have issues with them being ok with proprietary drivers and thus not entirely FOSS in spirit but seriously, if you need a highly useable daily driver, don't be so inflexible. Even newer hardware works like a charm in terms of automagically detecting drivers (my GTX 1070 Nvidia drivers were automatically installed from repo).

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • Sometimes "automagical" means it's too different from my preferences. Would still be able to recommend for other people. (Not the same people that prefers a tiling WM ...) That's the beauty of FOSS and Linux/UNIX, options and easy to customize ... B)

  • AlwaysSkintAlwaysSkint OG RETIRED
    edited November 2019

    On the desktop, i switched from Slackware to Mandrake/Mandriva to Ubuntu Hardy Heron, to Mint Felicia and onwards to current Mint. plus, of course trying various distros along the way. There's also LMDE for the debian thnx crew. ;)
    On a server it's either CentOS or debian depending on the software stack used/enforced.
    Perhaps I should see what all the fuss is about with Ubuntu server.

    In stasis until the shitposting stops/abates.
    Than=compare;then=sequence:brought=bring;bought=buy:staffs=pile of sticks:informations/infos=no plural.
    It wisnae me! A big boy done it and ran away. || NVMe2G for life! until death (the end is nigh).

  • My main one is Debian, but unfortunately sometimes I need to use CentOs and currently I'm beginning to test Alpine.

  • alpine linux

  • Debian user here =)

  • CentOS mostly, Debian when application requires.

  • I don't really like Linux, I like FreeBSD.

  • @FreeBSD said:
    I don't really like Linux, I like FreeBSD.

    The best is definitely the upcoming LESbian

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • @poisson said:

    @FreeBSD said:
    I don't really like Linux, I like FreeBSD.

    The best is definitely the upcoming LESbian

    I guess you want to have LESbian on a whole rack.

  • FreeBSD said: I guess you want to have LESbian on a whole floor.

    Yes!
    But the floor should have EtherChannel waterchannel

  • @FreeBSD said:

    @poisson said:

    @FreeBSD said:
    I don't really like Linux, I like FreeBSD.

    The best is definitely the upcoming LESbian

    I guess you want to have LESbian on a whole rack.

    One rack? Give me a DC

    Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow

  • @tgl said:
    alpine linux

    @mrtilde said:
    currently I'm beginning to test Alpine.

    Alpine, yes! How did I miss it in the poll?

    DM us for private tracker invite.

  • @terrorgen dunno, probably you did not see the forest from the trees :)

  • @poisson said:
    You don't need to list arch. Their users will tell you they use arch without you asking them.

    LOL. And honestly, it'd be stupid as hell to run arch on a server.

    Tab Fitts | Founder/CEO - Spry Servers
    SSD Shared Hosting || VPS || Dedicated Servers || Network Status || PHX1 LG || DAL1 LG || || AS398646 || 1-844-799-HOST (4678)

  • @SpryServers_Tab said:

    @poisson said:
    You don't need to list arch. Their users will tell you they use arch without you asking them.

    LOL. And honestly, it'd be stupid as hell to run arch on a server.

    Some providers provides them as an option, so I wonder

    DM us for private tracker invite.

  • @terrorgen said:

    @SpryServers_Tab said:

    @poisson said:
    You don't need to list arch. Their users will tell you they use arch without you asking them.

    LOL. And honestly, it'd be stupid as hell to run arch on a server.

    Some providers provides them as an option, so I wonder

    Well honestly, I'll provide whatever a client wants, and I have had requests for Arch. I provide an ISO if they want to install it, but I sure as hell don't recommend it. Too many updates break stuff. I mean I use it on my laptop, because I love bleeding-edge stuff - but i'd never use it on a server.

    Tab Fitts | Founder/CEO - Spry Servers
    SSD Shared Hosting || VPS || Dedicated Servers || Network Status || PHX1 LG || DAL1 LG || || AS398646 || 1-844-799-HOST (4678)

  • Debian and Ubuntu =)

  • Have always used Fedora since 2010s.

    ♻ Amitz day is October 21.
    ♻ Join Nigh sect by adopting my avatar. Let us spread the joys of the end.

  • Is there a special reason for you using Fedora?
    Something that makes is special for you? Or is it "just" what you are used too?

    Amitz, a very stable genius (it's true!) and Grand Rectumfier of the official LESLOS® (LES League of Shitposters).
    Certified braindead since 1974 and still perfectly happy.

  • @SpryServers_Tab said:

    @terrorgen said:

    @SpryServers_Tab said:

    @poisson said:
    You don't need to list arch. Their users will tell you they use arch without you asking them.

    LOL. And honestly, it'd be stupid as hell to run arch on a server.

    Some providers provides them as an option, so I wonder

    Well honestly, I'll provide whatever a client wants, and I have had requests for Arch. I provide an ISO if they want to install it, but I sure as hell don't recommend it. Too many updates break stuff. I mean I use it on my laptop, because I love bleeding-edge stuff - but i'd never use it on a server.

    I bought into the hype back in 2014 or so and my arch install breaks every day or two after I run pacman -Syu.
    Back to Debian I guess.

    I run elementaryOS as my desktop. On VPSes, it's always debian.

    DM us for private tracker invite.

  • WSSWSS OG Guru Meditation Error

    Debian-fork for general production; Alpine for specific single tasks.

    "It's a hard life- to be a stick insect." - Karl Pilkington

  • Ubuntu's LTS is what made the switch to 'Linux as daily-driver', possible for me (2006)
    I run Ubuntu LTS on most servers as well : Access to lots of readymade PPAs , 5 years of security patches, recent enough software versions for almost any server runtimes.

    2 or 3 storage-only servers run a minimal Debian Stable + ufw.

  • RadiRadi ProviderOG

    From those on the list, Debian. I mainly use it for personal servers. Otherwise, CentOS where needed.

    For desktop, I usually choose Linux Mint. Last few months, I have been eye-ing Deepin, it's interface looks nice.

    Get some hosting at https://drserver.net .

  • deankdeank OG
    edited November 2019

    @Amitz said:
    Is there a special reason for you using Fedora?
    Something that makes is special for you? Or is it "just" what you are used too?

    It was the very first unix distro I started to use.
    It works, so why change?

    Besides, I did like the name and the fact that it is a fork of Red Hat unix which I used few times before Fedora.

    ♻ Amitz day is October 21.
    ♻ Join Nigh sect by adopting my avatar. Let us spread the joys of the end.

  • I run variously Debian, Devuan, Slackware, and Ubuntu MATE.

    I've become fond of Devuan, and I'm hoping that the next stable release won't take many more months.

    I may decide to leave Slackware in the near future.

    I like Ubuntu MATE because it's probably the nicest instance of MATE, which is the desktop that I prefer.

    And Debian, of course.

    "A single swap file or partition may be up to 128 MB in size. [...] [I]f you need 256 MB of swap, you can create two 128-MB swap partitions." (M. Welsh & L. Kaufman, Running Linux, 2e, 1996, p. 49)

  • @WSS said:
    Debian-fork for general production; Alpine for specific single tasks.

    No more Void?

    "A single swap file or partition may be up to 128 MB in size. [...] [I]f you need 256 MB of swap, you can create two 128-MB swap partitions." (M. Welsh & L. Kaufman, Running Linux, 2e, 1996, p. 49)

Sign In or Register to comment.