US KVM ipv4 VPS $2/mo with recurring 50% OFF all orders + Free FTP250G Storage Account

2»

Comments

  • MS said:
    Banhammer incoming.

    The OGF just showed irrefutable evidence that @CharityHost_org is offering incentives for positive five star reviews on trustpilot, which is against the platform's TOS. There have been many calls for a ban on the OGF well. Let's see how this unfolds.

  • ok. i will not buy from this provider!

  • @lapua said:
    ok. i will not buy from this provider!

    Please do not. You buying into troll madness, we do not want or need the troll drama either.

    I was going to reply to @Faizo. But it's late and trolls exhausted me.

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @lapua said:
    ok. i will not buy from this provider!

    Please do not. You buying into troll madness, we do not want or need the troll drama either.

    I was going to reply to @Faizo. But it's late and trolls exhausted me.

    The OGF has all the answers you need. This provider is beyond salvation. You can spend your time and money in many better places.

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @lapua said:
    ok. i will not buy from this provider!

    Please do not. You buying into troll madness, we do not want or need the troll drama either.

    I was going to reply to @Faizo. But it's late and trolls exhausted me.

    what are you talking about?
    feedback from the community here is important to me. i have now ordered from another vps provider.

  • @lapua said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @lapua said:
    ok. i will not buy from this provider!

    Please do not. You buying into troll madness, we do not want or need the troll drama either.

    I was going to reply to @Faizo. But it's late and trolls exhausted me.

    what are you talking about?
    feedback from the community here is important to me. i have now ordered from another vps provider.

    He is entering a psychotic break on the OGF. Do not listen to CharityHost.

  • somiksomik OG Hostbusters

    @10thHouse said:

    @lapua said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @lapua said:
    ok. i will not buy from this provider!

    Please do not. You buying into troll madness, we do not want or need the troll drama either.

    I was going to reply to @Faizo. But it's late and trolls exhausted me.

    what are you talking about?
    feedback from the community here is important to me. i have now ordered from another vps provider.

    He is entering a psychotic break on the OGF. Do not listen to CharityHost.

    One of the purposes of a forum, interact with the users and get feedback from others before making a decision. Here @lapua made a well informed decision based on people's feedback. Any confusion, just do a quick google search for their review:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=CharityHost+review+forum

    I speak fluent sarcasm and broken logic. | I would agree with you, but thæn we’d both be wrong.

  • edited April 2025

    OGF gifted the red avatar to OP.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    @CharityHost_org how do you feel about the ban on OGF?

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • @cybertech said:
    @CharityHost_org how do you feel about the ban on OGF?

    apt moo

  • @localhost said:
    OGF gifted the red avatar to OP.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    They haven't misbehaved here, although it's just a matter of time.

    We accept Karma donations for the last flan. 🍮 affbrr

  • @mizzik said:

    @cybertech said:
    @CharityHost_org how do you feel about the ban on OGF?

    Proud moment.

  • @yoursunny said:

    @localhost said:
    OGF gifted the red avatar to OP.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    They haven't misbehaved here, although it's just a matter of time.

    Nodeseek is not taking their BS either.

  • @yoursunny said:

    @localhost said:
    OGF gifted the red avatar to OP.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    They haven't misbehaved here, although it's just a matter of time.

    I'm assuming the ban was (at least partially) for paying people to leave 5* TrustPilot reviews, more than specific on-forum misbehaviour.

  • @ahnlak said:

    @yoursunny said:

    @localhost said:
    OGF gifted the red avatar to OP.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    They haven't misbehaved here, although it's just a matter of time.

    I'm assuming the ban was (at least partially) for paying people to leave 5* TrustPilot reviews, more than specific on-forum misbehaviour.

    Oh, his forum misbehavior was certainly a factor. He was spamming rabidly and insulting other members.

  • thank god you can rely on the community here. i have now transferred my hard-earned finnmark to another provider. https://www.worldstream.com is really very stable.

  • @lapua said: https://www.worldstream.com is really very stable

    Good choice, only downside is price increases sometimes. Unless you have a contract with them.

  • @yoursunny said:

    @localhost said:
    OGF gifted the red avatar to OP.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    They haven't misbehaved here, although it's just a matter of time.

    Lmao

  • @treesmokah said:

    @lapua said: https://www.worldstream.com is really very stable

    Good choice, only downside is price increases sometimes. Unless you have a contract with them.

    money doesn't matter. finnmark are constantly on the rise.

  • MichaelCeeMichaelCee ModeratorProviderOG Cymru

    Some general statements for both sides of community:

    • LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
    • We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
    • Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance

    Do I personally approve of this brand? No
    Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
    Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it

  • Am I late for the party? Beating a dead rat could not be more fun 😊

  • @MichaelCee said:
    Some general statements for both sides of community:

    • LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
    • We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
    • Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance

    Do I personally approve of this brand? No
    Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
    Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it

    No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?

    I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.

    https://lowendspirit.com/discussion/comment/191386/#Comment_191386

    I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.

    It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.

    Team push-ups!

  • MichaelCeeMichaelCee ModeratorProviderOG Cymru
    edited May 2025

    @Astro said:

    @MichaelCee said:
    Some general statements for both sides of community:

    • LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
    • We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
    • Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance

    Do I personally approve of this brand? No
    Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
    Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it

    No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?

    I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.

    https://lowendspirit.com/discussion/comment/191386/#Comment_191386

    I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.

    It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.

    It's a buyer beware market. If a host breaks a rule, actions are enforced. If you believe a rule has been broken, report it.

    Like I said, we probably don't need to take action - they likely aren't going to return to posting offers.

  • somiksomik OG Hostbusters

    @MichaelCee said:

    @Astro said:

    @MichaelCee said:
    Some general statements for both sides of community:

    • LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
    • We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
    • Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance

    Do I personally approve of this brand? No
    Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
    Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it

    No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?

    I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.

    https://lowendspirit.com/discussion/comment/191386/#Comment_191386

    I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.

    It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.

    It's a buyer beware market. If a host breaks a rule, actions are enforced. If you believe a rule has been broken, report it.

    Like I said, we probably don't need to take action - they likely aren't going to return to posting offers.

    At least not under CH name. They'll probably buy a second hand domain and open a new hosting company pretending to be a old and reliable host...

    And @TheDP is to blame for the sale of the domain! :lol:

    I speak fluent sarcasm and broken logic. | I would agree with you, but thæn we’d both be wrong.

  • @somik said:

    @MichaelCee said:

    @Astro said:

    @MichaelCee said:
    Some general statements for both sides of community:

    • LES isn't LET, we don't ban people just cause they're banned on LET
    • We discourage trashing offer posts just "for the sake of it" and encourage customers to leave their own reviews (although much of the discussion here is justified IMO)
    • Mods are people with lives too, and flagging posts for no real reason is a bit shitty, try to only flag stuff with substance

    Do I personally approve of this brand? No
    Do I see any legitimate reason to ban them right now? It's debatable, but not really
    Do I see them continuing with posting offers? I doubt it

    No offence but like in this case it’s known that the provider isn’t reliable, shouldn’t some proactive actions be taken?

    I guess this comment with the rule didn’t age well either.

    https://lowendspirit.com/discussion/comment/191386/#Comment_191386

    I remember one of the providers here making a post for a free three month vps. I asked for the renewal pricing and they gave me a number. I posted that in the thread. One of the mods deleted those and moved it to cess pit since the offer was for a free vps only.

    It’s the old saying in my country - just because the pigeon decides to close its eyes doesn’t mean the cat isn’t about to fucking pounce and eat it.

    It's a buyer beware market. If a host breaks a rule, actions are enforced. If you believe a rule has been broken, report it.

    Like I said, we probably don't need to take action - they likely aren't going to return to posting offers.

    At least not under CH name. They'll probably buy a second hand domain and open a new hosting company pretending to be a old and reliable host...

    And @TheDP is to blame for the sale of the domain! :lol:

    If I'm not mistaken, CH is already this company's second name.

  • An apology goes a long way, just saying..

  • cybertechcybertech OGBenchmark King YABS 24/7/365

    @yucchun said:
    An apology goes a long way, just saying..

    he can keep it for himself. no longer necessary

    I bench YABS 24/7/365 unless it's a leap year.

  • somiksomik OG Hostbusters

    @cybertech said:

    @yucchun said:
    An apology goes a long way, just saying..

    he can keep it for himself. no longer necessary

    Ya, I dont think he care about people enough to do that anyway. All he wants is money.

    I speak fluent sarcasm and broken logic. | I would agree with you, but thæn we’d both be wrong.

Sign In or Register to comment.