Email Hosting Providers Comparison

2»

Comments

  • @Shot² said:

    @Joseph said:
    Most of what you do entails forwarding to Gmail?

    Sorry for being dumb but... What is the point of forwarding through Gmail?

    Can only speak for myself, but my reasoning is this:

    I've worked with email my entire life. I have used Lotus Notes, qmail, postfix, sendmail, every version ever released of Exchange, point and click stuff on windows such as mDaemon and hardcore stuff such as SIMS on Solaris. If it transports email in one way or another, there is a high probability I've used it. So I'm no stranger to email infrastructure, and not to sound over confident, but if it came down to running my own mailserver I would probably do it better then most email providers.
    But still, my main inbox is a gmail inbox. Why? Because not only is it free, it also outperforms basically everything else, free or paid.

    There is no way I or anyone else (with very few exceptions) could ever even come close to the kind of infrastructure that Google has, the resources are just enormous. The amount of features are just mindboggling and the security is topnotch. The spam filtering is really good and I can access my email via web, their app (which I have to reluctantly admit is not bad at all) or via whatever client I prefer, be it on phone, pc or web. I am usually not a Google fanboy but there is just no way to deny that gmail is a fantastic service. At least until Google decides to kill it. They do have a history of killing good services. :smile:

    With that being said about gmail, I do have lifetimes with both MXroute and Namecrane and I can not say enough good about the two of them. Excellent services and extremely good value considering the price. Would not hesitate to recommend them both.

  • bikegremlinbikegremlin ModeratorOG

    @rcy026 said:

    @Shot² said:

    @Joseph said:
    Most of what you do entails forwarding to Gmail?

    Sorry for being dumb but... What is the point of forwarding through Gmail?

    Can only speak for myself, but my reasoning is this:

    I've worked with email my entire life. I have used Lotus Notes, qmail, postfix, sendmail, every version ever released of Exchange, point and click stuff on windows such as mDaemon and hardcore stuff such as SIMS on Solaris. If it transports email in one way or another, there is a high probability I've used it. So I'm no stranger to email infrastructure, and not to sound over confident, but if it came down to running my own mailserver I would probably do it better then most email providers.
    But still, my main inbox is a gmail inbox. Why? Because not only is it free, it also outperforms basically everything else, free or paid.

    There is no way I or anyone else (with very few exceptions) could ever even come close to the kind of infrastructure that Google has, the resources are just enormous. The amount of features are just mindboggling and the security is topnotch. The spam filtering is really good and I can access my email via web, their app (which I have to reluctantly admit is not bad at all) or via whatever client I prefer, be it on phone, pc or web. I am usually not a Google fanboy but there is just no way to deny that gmail is a fantastic service. At least until Google decides to kill it. They do have a history of killing good services. :smile:

    With that being said about gmail, I do have lifetimes with both MXroute and Namecrane and I can not say enough good about the two of them. Excellent services and extremely good value considering the price. Would not hesitate to recommend them both.

    Important difference is that Google can kill my account without any fault of my own or any explanation.
    I trust Jarland and Francisco a lot more than I trust Google.

    Also, using my domain email - even if a provider is just closed, I can host my email elsewhere.

    That's important since email accounts are used for registering with practically every service nowadays.

  • jarlandjarland ProviderOG

    @flips said:

    @jarland said:

    @bikegremlin said: IMO, forwarding is a bad idea in the long run

    Unless you have me overseeing it. I forward all of my personal email to Gmail now so that I have to face the consequences of any failure first hand, because I've accepted the fact that this is most of what I do. And frankly, I'm ready to call it flawless.

    Obviously "flawless" is a trademarked advertising bullet point. It's short for "Flawless enough that I could give $1000 to every user that organically finds it to not be flawless without being homeless."

    Oh, that's interesting. IIRC correctly there used to be an issue related to SRS support and some providers (Yahoo?) having strict DMARC policy, so forwarding would fail?
    That issue is gone now? 🤔😃

    I'm not sure if everyone who matters changed their DMARC or if Google selectivity relaxed enforcement, I'm too afraid to check. But complaints about it at near zero and never about important senders.

    Do everything as though everyone you’ll ever know is watching.

  • jarlandjarland ProviderOG

    @Joseph said:
    P> @jarland said:

    @bikegremlin said: IMO, forwarding is a bad idea in the long run

    Unless you have me overseeing it. I forward all of my personal email to Gmail now so that I have to face the consequences of any failure first hand, because I've accepted the fact that this is most of what I do. And frankly, I'm ready to call it flawless.

    Obviously "flawless" is a trademarked advertising bullet point. It's short for "Flawless enough that I could give $1000 to every user that organically finds it to not be flawless without being homeless."

    Most of what you do entails forwarding to Gmail?

    Yeah. My entire existence is actually just to be an accessory to Google. I'm a keychain on a Google backpack. I've accepted it.

    Do everything as though everyone you’ll ever know is watching.

  • @bikegremlin said:

    @rcy026 said:

    @Shot² said:

    @Joseph said:
    Most of what you do entails forwarding to Gmail?

    Sorry for being dumb but... What is the point of forwarding through Gmail?

    Can only speak for myself, but my reasoning is this:

    I've worked with email my entire life. I have used Lotus Notes, qmail, postfix, sendmail, every version ever released of Exchange, point and click stuff on windows such as mDaemon and hardcore stuff such as SIMS on Solaris. If it transports email in one way or another, there is a high probability I've used it. So I'm no stranger to email infrastructure, and not to sound over confident, but if it came down to running my own mailserver I would probably do it better then most email providers.
    But still, my main inbox is a gmail inbox. Why? Because not only is it free, it also outperforms basically everything else, free or paid.

    There is no way I or anyone else (with very few exceptions) could ever even come close to the kind of infrastructure that Google has, the resources are just enormous. The amount of features are just mindboggling and the security is topnotch. The spam filtering is really good and I can access my email via web, their app (which I have to reluctantly admit is not bad at all) or via whatever client I prefer, be it on phone, pc or web. I am usually not a Google fanboy but there is just no way to deny that gmail is a fantastic service. At least until Google decides to kill it. They do have a history of killing good services. :smile:

    With that being said about gmail, I do have lifetimes with both MXroute and Namecrane and I can not say enough good about the two of them. Excellent services and extremely good value considering the price. Would not hesitate to recommend them both.

    Important difference is that Google can kill my account without any fault of my own or any explanation.

    That is true, but that is true about any provider. I would say the chances that a big player like Google do it without proper heads up are a lot smaller then the risk of a small player simply deadpooling or shutting down.

    I trust Jarland and Francisco a lot more than I trust Google.

    Not speaking ill of Jarland or Francisco in any way, they are both shining gems in this industry in every way, but I still see it as more likely that one of them disappears than Google disappearing. Not that I see any of it happening, but just in comparison. It has nothing to do with trust, it's just simple statistics and logic.

    Also, using my domain email - even if a provider is just closed, I can host my email elsewhere.

    Well, the question I answered was "why forward to gmail", so yes, I also use my own domain. If gmail shuts down, I forward it elsewhere. Which I already do, as a backup, but that's besides the point.

    That's important since email accounts are used for registering with practically every service nowadays.

    Absolutely agree.

  • MannDudeMannDude Provider IncogNET - Speech and Privacy

    Was ready to launch this during Black Friday of 2024, but held off as it was the wrong time to enter the market with Namecrane launching at the same time and also knowing that we'd be doing a massive datacenter migration that would have disrupted service for the email hosting in the coming months.

    Sort of sat on the project a while, getting busy with other things.

    It's back on the table now and should be ready soon(ish)!

  • Too bad all these nice projects are always US-based

    Happy customer at AlexHost, AxusHost, Bakker-IT, Host-C, Ionos, Veesp + NanoKVM ftw.

  • MannDudeMannDude Provider IncogNET - Speech and Privacy

    @Shot² said:
    Too bad all these nice projects are always US-based

    We're a US based company but the service will be in Bulgaria. Where would you realistically like to see companies registered, assuming it doesn't make it nearly impossible or not worth the bureaucratic hassle to register a company in that country as a non-resident?

    People gloat about the "offshore companies" then limit themselves to being blacklisted from banking and merchant accounts like PayPal. Then there is the option to register a foreign owned company in a number of European countries, but then you've gotta deal with their overbearing tax policies and changing landscape towards speech (bUt GdRp!!!) and stuff.

    US is simple.

  • edited January 14

    This was not a criticism addressed to your service specifically.
    Companies can get registered in any effingcountry they want if they think it's easier or cheaper for them.
    Just like consumers can snub any company or product they want for whatever reason they like ^^

    Happy customer at AlexHost, AxusHost, Bakker-IT, Host-C, Ionos, Veesp + NanoKVM ftw.

  • bikegremlinbikegremlin ModeratorOG

    @MannDude said:
    Was ready to launch this during Black Friday of 2024, but held off as it was the wrong time to enter the market with Namecrane launching at the same time and also knowing that we'd be doing a massive datacenter migration that would have disrupted service for the email hosting in the coming months.

    Sort of sat on the project a while, getting busy with other things.

    It's back on the table now and should be ready soon(ish)!

    Looking forward to this.

    If you plan to sell any lifetime deals (at reasonable cost, with the idea to avoid monthly charges, not to get stuff for free/supercheap), I'd be happy to support with my $. :)

  • Long-term user of Fastmail here.

    While I respect budget options like MXRoute for side projects, Fastmail is the benchmark for a reason. It’s not just about hosting; it’s about their contribution to open standards (JMAP, Cyrus). The search speed is instantaneous, and the reliability is enterprise-grade without the Google privacy tax.

    I tried Migadu for a while—great philosophy regarding simplified pricing (paying for bandwidth, not seats), but the administration features felt a bit too bare-bones for my daily driver.

    Avoid PurelyMail for mission-critical stuff. The pricing is unbeatable, but you get what you pay for when it comes to uptime and IP consistency. Good for throwaways, not for business.

  • bikegremlinbikegremlin ModeratorOG

    @kako1talk said:
    Long-term user of Fastmail here.

    While I respect budget options like MXRoute for side projects, Fastmail is the benchmark for a reason. It’s not just about hosting; it’s about their contribution to open standards (JMAP, Cyrus). The search speed is instantaneous, and the reliability is enterprise-grade without the Google privacy tax.

    I tried Migadu for a while—great philosophy regarding simplified pricing (paying for bandwidth, not seats), but the administration features felt a bit too bare-bones for my daily driver.

    Avoid PurelyMail for mission-critical stuff. The pricing is unbeatable, but you get what you pay for when it comes to uptime and IP consistency. Good for throwaways, not for business.

    I haven't found any problems with it over the years for practically every use.
    Deliverabilty, availability - top class.

    What do you find lacking with MXroute in particular?

  • @bikegremlin said:

    @kako1talk said:
    Long-term user of Fastmail here.

    While I respect budget options like MXRoute for side projects, Fastmail is the benchmark for a reason. It’s not just about hosting; it’s about their contribution to open standards (JMAP, Cyrus). The search speed is instantaneous, and the reliability is enterprise-grade without the Google privacy tax.

    I tried Migadu for a while—great philosophy regarding simplified pricing (paying for bandwidth, not seats), but the administration features felt a bit too bare-bones for my daily driver.

    Avoid PurelyMail for mission-critical stuff. The pricing is unbeatable, but you get what you pay for when it comes to uptime and IP consistency. Good for throwaways, not for business.

    I haven't found any problems with it over the years for practically every use.
    Deliverabilty, availability - top class.

    What do you find lacking with MXroute in particular?

    To clarify, strictly on deliverability and uptime, I agree 100%—MXRoute is a beast. Jarland is a wizard at managing IP reputation, better than providers charging 10x more.

    When I say 'lacking,' I’m referring specifically to the integrated ecosystem and UX friction.

    With MXRoute, the burden of the interface is on me—I’m relying on 3rd party MUAs, Crossbox, or Roundcube. They work, but they lack the proprietary polish, instantaneous server-side search (especially on massive archives), and the seamless calendar/contacts integration that Fastmail's native web/mobile clients offer.

    MXRoute is the best engine for the price; Fastmail is just a more comfortable car for my daily drive.

  • MannDudeMannDude Provider IncogNET - Speech and Privacy
    edited January 14

    @Shot² said:
    This was not a criticism addressed to your service specifically.
    Companies can get registered in any effingcountry they want if they think it's easier or cheaper for them.
    Just like consumers can snub any company or product they want for whatever reason they like ^^

    Oh I know, was just sort of a general rant about the topic at hand from my side.

    I had considered at one point changing jurisdictions but just couldn't find anything that made actual business sense. Increased regulation, increased taxes, decreased banking and merchant options, increased cookie banners.

    I did (and haven't 100% written it off) consider Georgian jurisdiction for non-IncogNET businesses, but that was mainly because I wouldn't be opposed to making Tbilisi or similar my home for a part of the year and this would be an easy entry to local banking and established roots that may make eventual residency easier later.

  • I just started to use EU-only providers due to privacy and GDPR reasons. Can someone recommend me an email service besides Proton & Tuta Mail?

    Recommended services*: Avoro, Bero-Host, Bunny, Enginyring, HetrixTools, HostBrr, Incognet, MXRoute, Mzungu, NameCrane, Sitebunker, SpeedyPage, Windscribe
    *Some links may be affiliate links. The list is sorted alphabetically.

  • @COLBYLICIOUS said:
    I just started to use EU-only providers due to privacy and GDPR reasons. Can someone recommend me an email service besides Proton & Tuta Mail?

    If you want to escape the 'walled garden' of encryption-at-rest providers like Proton/Tuta and just want standard, solid IMAP implementation within the EU, Mailbox.org is the answer.

  • edited January 14

    @MannDude said:
    I had considered at one point changing jurisdictions but just couldn't find anything that made actual business sense. Increased regulation, increased taxes, decreased banking and merchant options, increased cookie banners.

    I completely understand your point of view and I agree with all of it, but as always, every coin has two sides.

    I work a lot with customers that for one reason or another is obligated by law to adhere to certain policies and processes. It can be government, healthcare, military or basically any kind of business that do business with those kind of businesses.
    These customers specifically ask for those extra regulations and will not and can not host with a provider that does not adhere to the same juridical framework as they do. I've got a shitload of customers that would love to run 365 or Google Workspace, but they cant because that's American companies and lets be honest, nobody trusts the US. Google even tried to remedy this by setting up business in Ireland, which is a member of the EU. Every customer in the EU is now billed by Google Ireland, or "Google Cloud EMEA Limited" as the company is officially called. Smoke and mirrors if you ask me, but legally, it works.

    Anyway, what I am trying to say is that the thing that at first sight might seem like disadvantages, could in some cases actually be selling points. I'm not saying you are wrong, believe me I know the bureaucratic hassle better then most, I'm just saying keep in mind that even though it's a bitch, there is a (albeit small) silver lining to it as well and a good opportunity to gain access to a customer market that would otherwise not be able to buy from you.

  • WSSWSS OG Guru Meditation Error

    Zoho isn't the cheapest, but it's good.

    "It's a hard life- to be a stick insect." - Karl Pilkington

  • @kako1talk said:

    @COLBYLICIOUS said:
    I just started to use EU-only providers due to privacy and GDPR reasons. Can someone recommend me an email service besides Proton & Tuta Mail?

    If you want to escape the 'walled garden' of encryption-at-rest providers like Proton/Tuta and just want standard, solid IMAP implementation within the EU, Mailbox.org is the answer.

    Isn't Mailbox.org encrypted though?

    Recommended services*: Avoro, Bero-Host, Bunny, Enginyring, HetrixTools, HostBrr, Incognet, MXRoute, Mzungu, NameCrane, Sitebunker, SpeedyPage, Windscribe
    *Some links may be affiliate links. The list is sorted alphabetically.

  • @COLBYLICIOUS said:

    @kako1talk said:

    @COLBYLICIOUS said:
    I just started to use EU-only providers due to privacy and GDPR reasons. Can someone recommend me an email service besides Proton & Tuta Mail?

    If you want to escape the 'walled garden' of encryption-at-rest providers like Proton/Tuta and just want standard, solid IMAP implementation within the EU, Mailbox.org is the answer.

    Isn't Mailbox.org encrypted though?

    Yes, but the implementation is fundamentally different.

    Proton is encrypted by architecture. Their server has zero access, which breaks standard protocols—that's why you need their Bridge to use IMAP.

    Mailbox.org is encrypted by feature (via their 'Encrypted Inbox').

  • bikegremlinbikegremlin ModeratorOG

    @rcy026 said:

    @MannDude said:
    I had considered at one point changing jurisdictions but just couldn't find anything that made actual business sense. Increased regulation, increased taxes, decreased banking and merchant options, increased cookie banners.

    I completely understand your point of view and I agree with all of it, but as always, every coin has two sides.

    I work a lot with customers that for one reason or another is obligated by law to adhere to certain policies and processes. It can be government, healthcare, military or basically any kind of business that do business with those kind of businesses.
    These customers specifically ask for those extra regulations and will not and can not host with a provider that does not adhere to the same juridical framework as they do. I've got a shitload of customers that would love to run 365 or Google Workspace, but they cant because that's American companies and lets be honest, nobody trusts the US. Google even tried to remedy this by setting up business in Ireland, which is a member of the EU. Every customer in the EU is now billed by Google Ireland, or "Google Cloud EMEA Limited" as the company is officially called. Smoke and mirrors if you ask me, but legally, it works.

    Anyway, what I am trying to say is that the thing that at first sight might seem like disadvantages, could in some cases actually be selling points. I'm not saying you are wrong, believe me I know the bureaucratic hassle better then most, I'm just saying keep in mind that even though it's a bitch, there is a (albeit small) silver lining to it as well and a good opportunity to gain access to a customer market that would otherwise not be able to buy from you.

    Yes. GDPR is discriminatory. For EU companies or companies targeting EU citizens there aren’t options to avoid it.

    I try to avoid it.

  • @MannDude said:
    Was ready to launch this during Black Friday of 2024, but held off as it was the wrong time to enter the market with Namecrane launching at the same time and also knowing that we'd be doing a massive datacenter migration that would have disrupted service for the email hosting in the coming months.

    Sort of sat on the project a while, getting busy with other things.

    It's back on the table now and should be ready soon(ish)!

    I'm intrigued. Most email host only offered roundcube, rarely sogo. Imho vanilla roundcube are too basic, no caldav and carddav unless the provider customised it further. Sogo seems to be better at that, proper dav by default. Can't wait to try.

  • @WSS said:
    Zoho isn't the cheapest, but it's good.

    IIRC they offer a usable $1/Month thingie?
    I haven't tried it, though. Tried their free tier just after that lost IMAP access, so I moved on ... 😇

  • @bikegremlin said:

    @MannDude said:
    Was ready to launch this during Black Friday of 2024, but held off as it was the wrong time to enter the market with Namecrane launching at the same time and also knowing that we'd be doing a massive datacenter migration that would have disrupted service for the email hosting in the coming months.

    Sort of sat on the project a while, getting busy with other things.

    It's back on the table now and should be ready soon(ish)!

    Looking forward to this.

    If you plan to sell any lifetime deals (at reasonable cost, with the idea to avoid monthly charges, not to get stuff for free/supercheap), I'd be happy to support with my $. :)

    I second this I love lifetime deals!!

  • @MannDude said:

    @Shot² said:
    Too bad all these nice projects are always US-based

    We're a US based company but the service will be in Bulgaria. Where would you realistically like to see companies registered, assuming it doesn't make it nearly impossible or not worth the bureaucratic hassle to register a company in that country as a non-resident?

    People gloat about the "offshore companies" then limit themselves to being blacklisted from banking and merchant accounts like PayPal. Then there is the option to register a foreign owned company in a number of European countries, but then you've gotta deal with their overbearing tax policies and changing landscape towards speech (bUt GdRp!!!) and stuff.

    US is simple.

    I understand where you are coming from but I think people are concerned due to legal precedents like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United_States

    That you could be compelled to produce offshore data. However in this case it's encrypted so it wouldn't do them much good anyway. I do know there's history of warrants going further though like in the case of Lavabit where he chose to shut down the service rather than turn over the keys. What would you do in such a case? I'm seeing now that Lavabit was able to set something up later that would have avoid this attack on the wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavabit)

  • WSSWSS OG Guru Meditation Error

    @flips said:

    @WSS said:
    Zoho isn't the cheapest, but it's good.

    IIRC they offer a usable $1/Month thingie?
    I haven't tried it, though. Tried their free tier just after that lost IMAP access, so I moved on ... 😇

    I got a BlackFriday or some other deal a couple years ago. Their filtering is decent, their apps are usable (Actually gave up K-9 to use their native App, it's that good), and other than some dumb filtering on their part, everything is amazingly deep for administrative tasks. I'd have no problem using it in a corporate setting- but being that we get Google for free, we're using that.

    "It's a hard life- to be a stick insect." - Karl Pilkington

  • @WSS said:

    @flips said:

    @WSS said:
    Zoho isn't the cheapest, but it's good.

    IIRC they offer a usable $1/Month thingie?
    I haven't tried it, though. Tried their free tier just after that lost IMAP access, so I moved on ... 😇

    I got a BlackFriday or some other deal a couple years ago. Their filtering is decent, their apps are usable (Actually gave up K-9 to use their native App, it's that good), and other than some dumb filtering on their part, everything is amazingly deep for administrative tasks. I'd have no problem using it in a corporate setting- but being that we get Google for free, we're using that.

    Didn't Google revoke all free accounts used for non-personal use?

  • WSSWSS OG Guru Meditation Error

    @Joseph said:

    @WSS said:

    @flips said:

    @WSS said:
    Zoho isn't the cheapest, but it's good.

    IIRC they offer a usable $1/Month thingie?
    I haven't tried it, though. Tried their free tier just after that lost IMAP access, so I moved on ... 😇

    I got a BlackFriday or some other deal a couple years ago. Their filtering is decent, their apps are usable (Actually gave up K-9 to use their native App, it's that good), and other than some dumb filtering on their part, everything is amazingly deep for administrative tasks. I'd have no problem using it in a corporate setting- but being that we get Google for free, we're using that.

    Didn't Google revoke all free accounts used for non-personal use?

    Not non-profit.

    "It's a hard life- to be a stick insect." - Karl Pilkington

  • @kako1talk said:
    Long-term user of Fastmail here.

    While I respect budget options like MXRoute for side projects, Fastmail is the benchmark for a reason. It’s not just about hosting; it’s about their contribution to open standards (JMAP, Cyrus). The search speed is instantaneous, and the reliability is enterprise-grade without the Google privacy tax.

    I tried Migadu for a while—great philosophy regarding simplified pricing (paying for bandwidth, not seats), but the administration features felt a bit too bare-bones for my daily driver.

    Avoid PurelyMail for mission-critical stuff. The pricing is unbeatable, but you get what you pay for when it comes to uptime and IP consistency. Good for throwaways, not for business.

    Fastmail pricing seems in the same ballpark as Google's pricing.

  • @Joseph said:

    @kako1talk said:
    Long-term user of Fastmail here.

    While I respect budget options like MXRoute for side projects, Fastmail is the benchmark for a reason. It’s not just about hosting; it’s about their contribution to open standards (JMAP, Cyrus). The search speed is instantaneous, and the reliability is enterprise-grade without the Google privacy tax.

    I tried Migadu for a while—great philosophy regarding simplified pricing (paying for bandwidth, not seats), but the administration features felt a bit too bare-bones for my daily driver.

    Avoid PurelyMail for mission-critical stuff. The pricing is unbeatable, but you get what you pay for when it comes to uptime and IP consistency. Good for throwaways, not for business.

    Fastmail pricing seems in the same ballpark as Google's pricing.

    You're right, the sticker price is very similar (around $5-6/month).

    But the value proposition is different. With Google, you are paying for the ecosystem, but you are also dealing with a company whose primary business model is data. With Fastmail, that price ensures you are the customer, not the product.

    For me, paying the same price to not have my data fed into the Google machine is a feature, not a bug.

Sign In or Register to comment.