deank
deank
About
- Username
- deank
- Joined
- Visits
- 7,966
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, OG
- Karma
- 1,668
Comments
-
Static ad is fine. I can tolerate them. If it's animated at any degree, I simply remove it with ad block.
-
You can charge me for keeping my troll tag. 7 bucks a year, I am willing to accept.
-
That is basically telling people to plot Chia. People tend to do the opposite of what is asked in general.
-
Luna location should be priority.
-
In my book, it's guilty until proven innocent. So far, nothing says he is innocent, not one bit.
-
There is no need to help out "those in need" that are HS customers. They deserve whatever they got. I don't actually have an issue with cociu's method. There are plenty of people who live that way in this world. I don't pi…
-
@Bigweb
-
Guys, it's for a friend of mine. How do I setup server-to-server VPN for privacy?
-
Years ago.
-
(Quote) I said people. Or have we gone so far left that we are treating machines as lifeforms now?
-
There are still people who cling to Windows XP direly. I don't get it. One of their reasons for continuing to use XP was due to "privacy". Fak me. What fools.
-
I can see many willing to do that for you, as long as you are fine with not getting what you order for.
-
Can't keep being bogged down by the past. Has to move on at some point.
-
Yeah, exactly the same way.
-
What? So, you read the rules then you ask? What does that even mean? You didn't understand what you read?
-
He could have just read the rules. But he wanted to start a thread to advertise passively.
-
I am gonna let it all out! The end is nigh. That is all. Phew, that felt good.
-
I am always a loser.
-
Performance of VPS fluctuate. Doesn't matter how isolated each accounts are. In the end it is shared. Therefore, benchmark of a VPS is ultimately meaningless. Whatever number you get, it's not the result that will hold up.
-
Because, for benchmark junkies, real world performance is not important. Only synthetic numbers are a matter of importance to them.
-
Catering to small businesses is selective. For the low end hosting market though, I don't really care what happen to them. Whatever they get, I will say they deserve it. They are the whinest and loudest bunch.
-
I'd say 14 bucks per or whatever it is at now a Cpanel license is a rip off - if - you can run your server without it. Majority of those on LET have to have it. So, it ain't a rip-off. It's essential cost.
-
(Quote) You kind of answered the grand question - the scale of development and commitment required.
-
When CPanel price increased - We are gonna develop / roll our own! Years later - Nothing. WHMCS price increase - We are gonna develop / roll our own! Prediction - Nada. Would love to be proven wrong.
-
If one needs that kind of screenshot, he needs help.
-
The screenshot key is all I need for screenshots.
-
You are right that you can't compared it with grocery. One has to feed himself. Can't pay it? You die. No alternatives. WHMCS price increase? Who cares. There are alternatives, and it won't kill ya. Can't compare indeed.
-
And who is to blame for such flawed mentality? Hosts in my book.
-
Doesn't seem that bad. My grocery budget had to go up by 20% last year. And it is going to go up by another 20% this year. Everything goes up. What's new? I do feed sad about those on fixed wages though. Webhosting companies are better …
-
It used to be that 80% of users are basically idlers. This rule holds true still if your target audience is the general people. But that changes when you enter lowend. These people demand a lot for a penny. Also avoid anyone who asks for dedicated …
-
Doesn't matter. It matters to only geeks.
-
666 seconds.
-
Much harder to get away.