<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>postgresql — LowEndSpirit</title>
        <link>https://www.lowendspirit.com/</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2026 00:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>postgresql — LowEndSpirit</description>
    <atom:link href="https://www.lowendspirit.com/discussions/tagged/postgresql/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Have anyone tried sharded PostgreSQL on TierHive?</title>
        <link>https://www.lowendspirit.com/discussion/11621/have-anyone-tried-sharded-postgresql-on-tierhive</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2026 20:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>General</category>
        <dc:creator>pmasta</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">11621@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>It offers great value and the fact that you can choose the exact cpu and ram you get per server is incredibly valuable for different types of loads. But not sure about stability. Have anyone tried running a real sharded postgresql server either in one geographic location with read replicas or globally (horizontally)?</p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
